[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:57:54 +0300 |
> From: Sven Joachim <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:54:11 +0200
>
> > If Peter and you are talking about the build directory, then the
> > previous DOC should probably be removed, but do we really want the
> > build number NOT to be incremented anyway?
>
> I'm not certain I understand that; make clean removes all the emacs*
> binaries from the build tree and therefore should also remove the then
> useless DOC-* files. It probably makes sense to reset the build number
> to 1 after that, doesn't it? Or what do you mean?
I meant that perhaps the build number should grow even after "make
clean".
- 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Sven Joachim, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Sven Joachim, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/13
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/13
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/12