[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:58:54 +0900 |
Peter Dyballa writes:
>
> Am 12.04.2008 um 22:49 schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull:
> > Then it is very useful to have a convenient unique identifier for
> > each build.
>
> GNU Emacs has this information when you start to send a bug report.
>
>
> Upon configuration some files are overwritten. Upon 'make bootstrap'
> some more files are overwritten even twice. Upon 'make install' all
> files (hopefully) are overwritten. Isn't that already enough uniqueness?
No. Because the files are overwritten, you cannot determine whether
the builds are the same or not.
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, (continued)
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Sven Joachim, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/13
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/13
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12