[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:43:35 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Peter Dyballa <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:14:20 +0200
>
> > I think this is intended, as you still have the Emacs binary from the
> > previous build (emacs-${version}.buildnumber) around, and could use
> > it, e.g., for comparison or some other purpose.
>
>
> Not when I install or make clean. The installed Emacs wants etc/DOC-$
> {version}.<highest buildnumber>, the cleaned (deleted) Emacs cannot
> want anything.
It used to be the case that the built binary was installed under 2
different names: `emacs' and `emacs-${version}.buildnumber', which
were both hard links to the same file. Deleting `emacs' would then
leave the other one around, and when invoked, it would want the DOC
file with the corresponding suffix. Is this no longer the case? That
is, does installing a new version completely erases the old one?
- 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Sven Joachim, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Sven Joachim, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/13