[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: un-deprecating CL
From: |
Johan Bockgård |
Subject: |
Re: un-deprecating CL |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:59:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> some every notany
> remove-if delete-if
>
> Those are useful operations, and I would like to add facilities to do
> them. However, I don't like the CL functions because of their CL
> style keyword argument, which I feel conflicts with the spirit of
> Emacs Lisp.
FWIW, some, every, notany (and notevery) don't use keyword arguments.
Here are a few other things
* Make `=', `/=', `<', '<=' etc take a &rest argument (they do in
XEmacs). "The value of < is true if the numbers are in monotonically
increasing order; otherwise it is false." This is actually useful.
* Make mapcar take a &rest arg (i.e it should do what mapcar* does
now).
--
Johan Bockgård
- Re: un-deprecating CL, (continued)
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Joe Wells, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, martin rudalics, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, martin rudalics, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL,
Johan Bockgård <=
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Johan Bockgård, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/21
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16