[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: un-deprecating CL
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: un-deprecating CL |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:21:12 -0400 |
some every notany
remove-if delete-if
Those are useful operations, and I would like to add facilities to do
them. However, I don't like the CL functions because of their CL
style keyword argument, which I feel conflicts with the spirit of
Emacs Lisp.
Thus, I would rather add other facilities with simpler interfaces
to do these things.
Instead of `remove-if', there could be a macro `filter',
like `dolist' except that the body says whether to keep
an element or discard it.
Another macro could be designed to replace `some', `every' and
`notany'.
These macros would also run faster than those function calls,
for whatever that is worth.
- Re: un-deprecating CL, (continued)
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Karl Fogel, 2007/09/14
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Joe Wells, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, martin rudalics, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, martin rudalics, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Johan Bockgård, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Johan Bockgård, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/21
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16