[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: un-deprecating CL
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: un-deprecating CL |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:58:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
> dotimes declare
>
> `dotimes' is already supported.
>
> How is CL `declare' useful in Emacs Lisp?
The above was in response to Joe Wells' remark
>> I suppose also someone should check whether the definitions in CL of
>> these are the same as the non-CL Emacs definitions (and if so delete
>> the ones in CL, otherwise somehow merge the functionality):
>>
>> pop push dolist caar cadr cdar cddr
All these (as well as `dotimes' and `declare') create the following
problem: When I eval a buffer containing an
(eval-when-compile (require 'cl) ...)
and subsequently invoke C-h f on one of these macros, I'm told that they
are Lisp macros in cl-macs.elc or cl.elc. This is annoying because
their doc-strings may differ frequently - the cl-macs.el version of
`declare' doesn't have a doc-string at all. Obviously, `find-function'
will get me to the cl-macs.el/cl.el versions as well.
- Re: un-deprecating CL, (continued)
- Re: un-deprecating CL, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Johan Bockgård, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Johan Bockgård, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/21
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18