[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: copyrights to be fixed
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: copyrights to be fixed |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Feb 2007 05:54:34 -0500 |
Are there major gaps in the features?
No, not that I have seen.
A small number of people can't tell the answer to this question by
running the program.
We need the people who implemented the multi-tty code to tell us
whether there are cases they have not handled yet that need to be
handled to avoid loss of functionality.
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, (continued)
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/08
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/02/08
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, David Kastrup, 2007/02/09
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Romain Francoise, 2007/02/09
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/09
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, joakim, 2007/02/09
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/10
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Robert J. Chassell, 2007/02/10
- Re: copyrights to be fixed,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, joakim, 2007/02/11
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, David Kastrup, 2007/02/11
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Jan Djärv, 2007/02/11
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/12
- multi-tty branch + GTK (Re: copyrights to be fixed), rentey <address@hidden>, 2007/02/14
- Re: multi-tty branch + GTK (Re: copyrights to be fixed), Richard Stallman, 2007/02/14
- Re: multi-tty branch + GTK (Re: copyrights to be fixed), Karoly Lorentey, 2007/02/16
- Re: multi-tty branch + GTK (Re: copyrights to be fixed), Jan Djärv, 2007/02/15
- Re: multi-tty branch + GTK (Re: copyrights to be fixed), David Kastrup, 2007/02/15
- Re: multi-tty branch + GTK (Re: copyrights to be fixed), Jan Djärv, 2007/02/15