[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Dec 2006 14:53:23 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I don't have anything to add directly to this discussion, but it would
> help tremendously if people would put _explanations_ in the changelog,
> instead of just listing the changes.
>
> No, no, no! Explanations belong in comments in the code.
Ok, that makes sense.
In this case, the issue is whether nt/makefile-w32-in and similar
files should have DOS or Unix line endings.
There are no comments about line endings in the file.
Perhaps it should say:
# Using DOS line endings for Emacs 22. We've flipflopped on this
# several times; let's document why we make the next change.
--
-- Stephe
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, (continued)
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Stephen Leake, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in,
Stephen Leake <=
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/25
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/27
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/20
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, LENNART BORGMAN, 2006/12/22