[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:35:23 -0500 |
I don't have anything to add directly to this discussion, but it would
help tremendously if people would put _explanations_ in the changelog,
instead of just listing the changes.
No, no, no! Explanations belong in comments in the code.
Would you please look at the comments in these files?
If you think there are important points which are not clear
and which need more explanation, please mention them,
and we can add more explanation of them now.
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, (continued)
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Stephen Leake, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Stephen Leake, 2006/12/24
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/25
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/27
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/20
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, LENNART BORGMAN, 2006/12/22