[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in
From: |
LENNART BORGMAN |
Subject: |
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:34:59 +0100 |
From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
Date: Friday, December 22, 2006 11:13 am
Subject: Re: nt/makefile.w32-in
> On 12/22/06, Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > No, but I would be very surprised if it did. After all it is not
> very> uncommon for a Makefile to have consistent line endings ;-)
>
> So the answer is "no, I cannot guarantee it", isn't it? The
> possibility of you being surprised by unexpected troubles is unrelated
> to the issue.
;-)
What I want to avoid is trouble after the release for those who wants to build
themselves with tools that perhaps barks when there are different line endings
in Makefile. It seems like this point has somehow totally disappeared from our
discussion.
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, (continued)
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Stephen Leake, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Stephen Leake, 2006/12/24
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/25
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/27
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/20
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in,
LENNART BORGMAN <=