[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-g crash redux
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: C-g crash redux |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:40:17 +1200 |
> A strange observation: if you evaluate the sit-for defun, no crash
> happens. The byte-compiled version of sit-for, however, causes a
> crash due to a SPECL_INDEX imbalance.
It's not that strange seeing that abort is called after testing for the
SPECL_INDEX imbalance in Fbyte_code (unless there is an analagous call in
somewhere like Feval). In fact if BYTE_CODE_SAFE is defined, it appears Emacs
will just generate an error rather than crash.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: C-g crash redux, (continued)
- Re: C-g crash redux, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/04
- Re: C-g crash redux, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/04
- Re: C-g crash redux, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/04
- Re: C-g crash redux, Nick Roberts, 2006/08/04
- Re: C-g crash redux, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/04
- Re: C-g crash redux, David Kastrup, 2006/08/06
- Re: C-g crash redux, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/06
- Re: C-g crash redux, Nick Roberts, 2006/08/06
- Re: C-g crash redux, Nick Roberts, 2006/08/03
- Re: C-g crash redux, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/03
- Re: C-g crash redux, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/03