[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?
From: |
Randal L. Schwartz |
Subject: |
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? |
Date: |
15 Apr 2006 06:36:35 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
>>>>> "Piet" == Piet van Oostrum <address@hidden> writes:
Piet> Cperl-mode itself suggests (defalias 'perl-mode 'cperl-mode) which is much
Piet> easier.
Yeah, I've seen that, but that'd break any file that was marked -*- perl -*-
because the indenting is slightly different and the "phony" items you have
to sprinkle for perl-mode's mismatched balances would actually confuse
cperl-mode.
So, you have to have both. Simply calling cperl-mode "perl-mode" is no good.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<address@hidden> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), (continued)
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Piet van Oostrum, 2006/04/15
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?,
Randal L. Schwartz <=