[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:32:47 -0400 |
As the "maintainer" of both perl-mode and (until a few days ago) cperl-mode,
I'll vote to keep perl-mode as the default, because cperl-mode's code is
ugly.
I don't think that's the way to make the decision. I think it's a matter
of how well each mode works. If CPerl mode works better, and if it has
no painful surprises, then let's make it the default.
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), (continued)
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/12
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/12
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Piet van Oostrum, 2006/04/15