[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32 |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:19:24 +0200 |
On 8/9/05, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> wrote:
> None of these problems make Emacs unusable.
No, no unusable. However...
> The JPEG problem can be avoided
> by compiling with a Free compiler (which we do anyway for binary
> releases).
...that's not entirely true. We don't distribute the libraries' DLLs.
Matching a GCC-built Emacs with some MSVC-built libraries could expose
the same problem.
> The high CPU usage for server sockets can be avoided by not using server
> sockets. Perhaps that means we continue to recommend gnuserv to Windows
> users in 22.1, but it should not mean that we withhold Emacs binaries for > a
> much awaited version with many improvements over 21.x.
FWIW, I agree (that's why I didn't mention this item in my answer to David).
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- FOR-RELEASE.W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, David Kastrup, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Jason Rumney, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Lennart Borgman, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Lennart Borgman, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Jason Rumney, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Lennart Borgman, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Jason Rumney, 2005/08/09
- Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/08/09