[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Underlining in compile.el
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Underlining in compile.el |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:26:39 +1200 |
> However, ISTR that this complaint was made when there were bugs
> causing too much of the line to be highlighted. If fixing those bugs
> was enough to solve the problem, we don't need to do any more. Would
> those that found the situation confusing before please speak up now?
My preference was for just using mouse-1 where text is generally underlined
already e.g info, help, customize (not underlined) etc.
I think you/others said it should apply to all buffers.
My next preference would be to restrict the area where mouse-1 worked e.g in
grep just on file and line number while mouse-2 could still work over the
whole line. I would not know how to do this, but I am prepared to work on it
after the release.
I stopped following the thread, but I don't like the idea of adding underlining
as links already have mouse-face and a hand pointer. What next, a little
jingle that plays when the mouse is over the link?
Nick
- Underlining in compile.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/25
- Re: Underlining in compile.el, Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/26
- Re: Underlining in compile.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/27
- Re: Underlining in compile.el,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Underlining in compile.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/28
- Re: Underlining in compile.el, Nick Roberts, 2005/06/28
- Re: Underlining in compile.el, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/29
- Re: Underlining in compile.el, Nick Roberts, 2005/06/29
- Re: Underlining in compile.el, Nick Roberts, 2005/06/29
- Re: Underlining in compile.el, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/29