Re: ChangeLog fontifications

[Karl Eichwalder]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> [The alternative format you suggest, `(a)(b)(c)' does not provide any real
> advantage for the reader -- embedded ") (" pairs are in fact _harder_ to
> parse for a human than commas because they're busier, and less familiar.]

`(a)(b)\n(c)' is better than `(a, b)\n(c)' because the second flavor is
highly misleading: grouping is artificial.  Please, switch to `(a, b,\nc)'.

['\n' denotes newline.]

-- 
                                                         |      ,__o
                                                         |    _-\_<,
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/                            |   (*)/'(*)