[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ChangeLog fontifications
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: ChangeLog fontifications |
Date: |
13 May 2004 18:25:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>> What on earth was the reason to invent such a convention?
> Because (1) it's more friendly to line-oriented parsers (like font-lock, but
> also external tools [*]), and (2) it looks quite nice.
Indeed, I strongly suspect that the convention was designed before
font-lock existed.
In any case we have to live with the fact that many projects don't follow
this part of the convention (and thus lived without complaining with
font-lock not highlighting things the way they wanted). I think fixing
font-lock to follow their use would go in the wrong direction unless it is
decided to change the convention. What would be better would indeed be
things like teaching fill&auto-fill how to do things right.
OTOH adding a big fat font-lock-warning-face where the convention is not
followed (like I do) would probably result in a massive popular revolt.
Stefan
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, (continued)
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Alan Shutko, 2004/05/13
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/05/13
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Karl Eichwalder, 2004/05/13
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Miles Bader, 2004/05/14
- Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/05/14
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/05/14
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/05/14
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Sam Steingold, 2004/05/14
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/14