[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Various simple.el patches
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Various simple.el patches |
Date: |
Sat, 24 May 2003 19:20:31 -0400 |
C-k is similar to C-@ C-e C-w.
C-u 1 C-k is similar to C-@ C-e C-f C-w.
C-u 0 C-k is similar to C-@ C-a C-w.
By analogy, I'd expect C-u -1 C-k to be similar to C-@ C-a C-b C-w.
But it is like C-@ C-a C-p C-w.
What do people think?
I think this should not be changed.
- Re: Various simple.el patches, (continued)
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/05/25
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/25
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/25
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/23
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/23
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/23
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/23
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/23
- Re: Various simple.el patches,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/05/27
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/28
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Ami Fischman, 2003/05/14
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/14
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/16
Re: Various simple.el patches, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2003/05/15
Re: Various simple.el patches, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/16