[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Various simple.el patches
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Various simple.el patches |
Date: |
Thu, 15 May 2003 23:51:40 -0400 |
The idea that `oh, in _this_ situation, it works _backwards_,' not because
it
actually makes much sense, but (apparently) simply because that particular
case is otherwise a no-op seems like a quick trip to a totally confusing
user
interface.
I agree. I won't accept this change.
- Re: Various simple.el patches, (continued)
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/23
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/23
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/24
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/05/27
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/28
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Ami Fischman, 2003/05/14
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/14
- Re: Various simple.el patches,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Various simple.el patches, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2003/05/15
Re: Various simple.el patches, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/16