[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: info |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:03:41 -0600 (CST) |
>From my previous message:
It would be better if RETURN actually went to the desired node in
the situations I described, but again, I do not see how to get the
"best of both worlds".
To be more explicit: not going anywhere is a lot better than going the
wrong place. As mentioned before, I am more worried about confusion
than convenience.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: info, (continued)
- Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/31
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/31
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/31
Re: info, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/29
- Re: info,
Luc Teirlinck <=