[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 05:19:31 -0500 |
> This user-visible change would affect much more than ispell.
Huh? Such as what? I's very unusual to apply a coding-system to a piece of
text that is not within the safe-chars of that coding-system.
Are Latin-2 characters within the safe-chars of iso-latin-1 now? I
don't know how to tell, but I would expect that they are, since it can
encode them. With this change, it won't be able to encode them,
and it will be unsafe in cases where now it is safe.
That is a user-visible change. Perhaps it is a good change,
but I want to hear what people think of it.
- iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/11/10
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/12
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/11/17
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/18