[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:00:36 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>> >> Yes. IIRC, this is hard-coded in the encoder's C code: it works as if
>> >> latin-1 was actually iso-latin-1-wth-esc.
>>
>> > How can we change that ?
>>
>> This change will do.
> This user-visible change would affect much more than ispell.
> Is it the right thing in general?
After reading Stefan's previous mail, I tend to agree with
him. At least I think this change makes nothing worse.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/09
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/09
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/11
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/12
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/11/17
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/18