[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:48:46 +0300 |
> From: address@hidden (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:33:02 +0200
>
> > It is impossible to display the message text without decoding it from
> > whatever coding system it is encoded in.
>
> I think that's what Eli meant: an incoming message is already encoded
> in some way, and Eli suggested to just leave it like that and to
> decode on viewing.
Almost. There are the cases where the existing charset= header lies.
A user can then do a "M-x rmail-redecode-body RET ENCODING RET", and
get the message decoded differently. I think in these cases Emacs
should rewrite the charset= header according to the new encoding.
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, (continued)
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/18
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/20
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/21
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kenichi Handa, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Paul Michael Reilly, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/24
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/24
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Dave Love, 2002/10/21
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/21