[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22 |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Oct 2002 09:03:23 +0200 (IST) |
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Richard Stallman wrote:
> There is no need to keep Babyl format
I suspect there are lots of people who keep their mail archives in Babyl
format. While I understand that conversion is possible (even today), it
might be impractical and/or user-unfriendly to require that all of them
be converted. Especially since Emacs 21 keeps Babyl files in emacs-mule
while earlier versions didn't; this might cause some breakage during
conversion to mbox and the return of the ubiquitous \201 bug.
So I tend to agree with Handa-san on this issue.
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/13
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Dave Love, 2002/10/15
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/18
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/20
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/21
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kenichi Handa, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25