[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22 |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 03:29:35 -0400 |
> In general, as I've said elsewhere in this thread, I think Emacs
> should encode each message in its original encoding (given by
> charset=).
I agree except I'd say "keep" instead of "encode": it should preserve
the `mbox' content byte-for-byte which is sometimes difficult to do when
you do decode+encode.
BTW MIME mail can contain several parts with different encodings in each
one of them, so it's a bit misleading to say talk about "the buffer's
coding system" unless each part is displayed in another buffer, which
is undesirable in the general case.
Stefan
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, (continued)
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kenichi Handa, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Paul Michael Reilly, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/24
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Dave Love, 2002/10/21
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/21
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/21
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Paul Michael Reilly, 2002/10/18
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/19