[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reducing defface redundancy
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: reducing defface redundancy |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:47:50 -0600 (MDT) |
Remember, by default (unless you select `Show All Display Specs'), the
face customization widget basically tosses out all the clauses of the
current defface spec except the active one. So, 99% of the time, the
user only deals with the _current_ definition of a face, and is happy.
Simple face customization is clean now because it affects just one
alternative, and it is easy and well-defined to select just the
alternative that applies.
With your propose defface change, the attributes actually specified
would not come from a single alternative in a simple way. So the
customization of the active parts of the defface spec would raise
difficult issues. If the user adds a new attribute, where in the
structure does it go?
- reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/19
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Alex Schroeder, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/21
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/21
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/24
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/24
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/25
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/25
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/21