[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reducing defface redundancy
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: reducing defface redundancy |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 10:14:18 +0300 |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Date: 20 Apr 2002 12:12:57 +0900
>
> (defface subtle-yet-underlined-mode-line
> '(:inherit mode-line
> :underline t
> (((background light) :background "grey90")
> ((background dark) :background "grey10"))))
>
> So what'ya think? It shouldn't be hard to implement, given the
> existance of `display-capable-p', it's backward-compatible, and whizzy
> as all hell (well, I think so anyway)...
I'm not sure this will make defface's we have less redundant and
repetitive, but I think the feature as such can be useful.
- reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/19
- Re: reducing defface redundancy,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Alex Schroeder, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/21
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/21
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/22