[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:36:41 -0400 |
> But Handa-san listed a couple of problems with using the standard syntax
> tables.
I seem to have missed his email.
> For example, a newline has whitespace syntax, but we don't want
> it to be considered as trailing whitespace, do we?
I assumed that newline was already treated specially so it wouldn't
even be looked up in the table.
Stefan
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, (continued)
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/09
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/10
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/11
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/12
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/13
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/14
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/15
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/19
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Ulrich Neumerkel, 2002/04/14
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Kenichi Handa, 2002/04/14
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Kenichi Handa, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Kenichi Handa, 2002/04/21