[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:16:46 -0600 (MDT) |
I cannot think of any particularly bad consequences of using the syntax
tables, but I do see some issues that perhaps need to be considered:
- the definition of whitespace will become mode-dependent;
Really? Which modes change this?
I don't think it would be a problem if this were affected
by some modes, I just am surprised that there are any modes that
would do so.
- Lisp programs that modify syntax tables could affect the
trailing-whitespace feature; in particular, if some unexpected
characters are defined to have whitespace syntax, users of trailing
whitespace might become surprised by the results.
I think this would be a change for the better in such a case.
Could you make the change?
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/09
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/09
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/11
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/12
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/13
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/14
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/15
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/19