[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No doc strings from DOC
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: No doc strings from DOC |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Apr 2002 10:27:08 +0200 |
On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 12:32:35 -0500, "Stefan Monnier"
<monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:
> But you don't get "Wrong type argument: stringp, 0" any more, right ?
> And you did say earlier that you already got "not documented" before
> my changes to doc.c, right ?
>
> So the only change left is that you get prompted for reload.
> Do I understand it right?
After updating from CVS and bootstraping today I no longer get the
reloading question, nor the "Wrong type argument" error. Just a "not
documented" comment in the help.
It is happening for functions in standard modules that get preloaded,
i.e. simple.el, subr.el, widget.el, etc. If I manually reload one of
those files, either in .el or .elc form, the comments are OK.
For the failing functions, the code
tem = AREF (fun, COMPILED_DOC_STRING);
in Fdocumentation (doc.c, line 396) is returning 0, but I don't know why.
Any more hints on how to debug this?
/L/e/k/t/u
- No doc strings from DOC, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/04/03
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/04/03
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/03
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/04/03
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/03
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/04/03
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/03
- Re: No doc strings from DOC,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/04/04
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Jason Rumney, 2002/04/04
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/04
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/04/10
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/10
- Re: No doc strings from DOC, Jason Rumney, 2002/04/10