[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el 1.6.1
From: |
Tak Ota |
Subject: |
Re: table.el 1.6.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:15:59 -0800 (PST) |
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:00:08 -0500: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden>
wrote:
> > I wasn't very happy about (set-buffer-modified-p (buffer-modified-p))
> > idiom because it is not self descriptive at all. I hope your change
>
> subr.el has had
>
> (defun force-mode-line-update (&optional all)
> "Force the mode line of the current buffer to be redisplayed.
> With optional non-nil ALL, force redisplay of all mode lines."
> (if all (save-excursion (set-buffer (other-buffer))))
> (set-buffer-modified-p (buffer-modified-p)))
>
> for a long time now. It does the same, but the name is more descriptive.
Thanks, I didn't know that. However, not requiring this one is even
better.
-Tak
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, (continued)
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/21
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Tak Ota, 2002/03/21
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Tak Ota, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1,
Tak Ota <=
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/23
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/23
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/24
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/25
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/25
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/28
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/28
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/29
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/31
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Miles Bader, 2002/03/31