[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el 1.6.1
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: table.el 1.6.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:00:08 -0500 |
> I wasn't very happy about (set-buffer-modified-p (buffer-modified-p))
> idiom because it is not self descriptive at all. I hope your change
subr.el has had
(defun force-mode-line-update (&optional all)
"Force the mode line of the current buffer to be redisplayed.
With optional non-nil ALL, force redisplay of all mode lines."
(if all (save-excursion (set-buffer (other-buffer))))
(set-buffer-modified-p (buffer-modified-p)))
for a long time now. It does the same, but the name is more descriptive.
Stefan
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, (continued)
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/21
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Tak Ota, 2002/03/21
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Tak Ota, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Tak Ota, 2002/03/22
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/23
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/23
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/24
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/25
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/25
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/28
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/28
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/29
- Re: table.el 1.6.1, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/31