[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:00:13 -0500 |
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:07:55 -0700 (MST), Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
> > The new text would be somewhat longer and that might be inconvenient.
>
> If pixels are so scarce, "(IELM on buffer-name)" could be
> "(IELM:buffer-name)". I bet buffer names aren't usually so large as to
> make any difference, and IELM buffers usually don't have minor modes
> active, so there's (relatively) plenty of space.
Agreed.
Stefan "a IELM user"
PS: I actually don't care about saving three chars so " on " is just
as good as ":" AFAIC.
- ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline,
Stefan Monnier <=