[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline |
Date: |
28 Feb 2002 22:06:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> > What about changing the buffer name rather than the mode-line-process, ie.
>
> <snip>
>
> > At least, that would display the information in the part of the mode line
> > where (potentially long) names are already shown.
>
> Ok, I think that's a good idea, but it requires more code, because
>
> ELISP> (setq mode-name '("IELM on " (:eval (buffer-name
> ielm-working-buffer))))
> *** Eval error *** error: "Only strings should be stored in the buffer-local
> variable mode-name"
I wasn't talking about mode-name.
I was suggesting to use something like
(rename-buffer (concat "*IELM on "
(buffer-name ielm-working-buffer) "*"))
whenever C-c C-b is called.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28