[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:27:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.2.50 (ia64-suse-linux) |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
|> On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:07:55 -0700 (MST), Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
wrote:
|>
|> > The new text would be somewhat longer and that might be inconvenient.
|>
|> If pixels are so scarce, "(IELM on buffer-name)" could be
|> "(IELM:buffer-name)". I bet buffer names aren't usually so large as to
Buffer names can be quite large, the one I'm currently typing in is named
"*wide reply to Juanma Barranquero*".
|> make any difference, and IELM buffers usually don't have minor modes
|> active, so there's (relatively) plenty of space.
At least it should perhaps be omitted if the buffer is the same as the
IELM buffer.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28