[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on reve
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 14:07:53 +0200 (IST) |
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Kenichi Handa wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> >> I don't think that revert-buffer should autodetect at all.
>
> > IIRC, that's what it does now: it uses the value of
> > buffer-file-coding-system to decode the file.
>
> ??? The words after ":" is correct, thus the words before
> ":" is wrong.
Andreas says Emacs should not autodetect in revert-buffer. What I meant
to say is that it doesn't autodetect right now: it uses whatever
buffer-file-coding-system says.
> It uses the value of buffer-file-coding-system, thus it does
> NOT autodetect the encoding.
Exactly. That's what I wanted to say. I believe Andreas said that this
is how it should stay. However, this thread started when Simon asked
that it _did_ autodetect, at least the EOL format.
> Of course, C-x RET c undecided M-x revert-buffer will force
> Emacs autodetection.
It does auto-detect, but it doesn't change buffer-file-coding-system. So
if you visit a DOS file, then run dos2unix on it, and the revert-buffer with
"C-x RET c unix RET", and edit and save the buffer, it gets saved with
DOS EOL format.
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Miles Bader, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/27
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Kenichi Handa, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?],
Eli Zaretskii <=