[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on reve
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] |
|
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:19:02 +0200 (IST) |
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> How about just setting buffer-file-coding-system to
> last-coding-system-used in revert-buffer if coding-system-for-read is
> non-nil? This way you can use `C-x RET c undecided' to force
> re-detection.
This might be something to which we could give a try.
> +Sets `buffer-file-coding-system' to the atually used coding system if
There's a typo here.
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], (continued)
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Miles Bader, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?],
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Kenichi Handa, 2002/02/25