[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lost argument and doc string
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: lost argument and doc string |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:37:40 +0200 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:34:14 +0100
>
> > Is it possible that the change in the way doc strings are put in C files
> > confuses the Windows port, either the make-docfile program or Emacs
> > itself?
>
> Maybe, but then why some docstrings can be seen just fine?
Because some doc strings come from Lisp files?
But that's a stab in the dark; it would be nice if someone could step
with a debugger through the offending code and see what's going on
there.
- lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/10
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/10
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Pavel Janík, 2002/02/10
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/10
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Pavel Janík, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/13