[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lost argument and doc string
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: lost argument and doc string |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:34:14 +0100 |
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:48:57 +0200 (IST), Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> This _does_ seem Windows-specific, because I cannot reproduce it, and
> also because another user of the Windows version reported a similar
> problem with what looked like a perfectly valid DOC file.
I'm certainly seeing the same problem, even after nmake bootstrap (on a
Windows XP, with a MSVC-compiled Emacs 21.2.50).
> Is it possible that the change in the way doc strings are put in C files
> confuses the Windows port, either the make-docfile program or Emacs
> itself?
Maybe, but then why some docstrings can be seen just fine?
/L/e/k/t/u
- lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/10
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/10
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Pavel Janík, 2002/02/10
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/10
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Pavel Janík, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/13