Re: [Duplicity-talk] command differences between duplicity and rsync !?

[Ryan Puckett]

SYNass IT Ubuntu / Linux wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 10:39 +0800, SYNass IT Ubuntu / Linux wrote:
>   
>> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 09:28 +0200, Olivier Croquette wrote:
>>     
>>> Ian Barton wrote, On 18/06/08 9:02:
>>>       
>>>> The whole point of Duplicity is encryption, so if you *don't* want
>>>> encryption rsync is what you need.
>>>>         
>>> No, other big differences are incremental backups and compression !
>>>       
>> Hi Ian & Oliver
>> Thanks for your efforts and feedbacks !
>>
>> @ Ian:
>> - not only encryption isn't sought !
>>
>> @Olivier:
>> - compression isn't wanted too !!
>>
>> Important, confirmed by Olivier, is the difference in incrementals !!!
>>
>> Well, I am not having that much data ...
>> ... but our external HDD's aren't on always and within a certain time 
>> there will be still quite some data to be Duplicity'ied ;-)
>> To shorten this incremental adjusting is appreciated and sought. ;-D
>>
>> One more question:
>> How exactly does the Duplicity command differ from the rsync one ?
>>
>> rsync -av --delete --progress /source /target
>>
>> I appreciate your advice to optimize my efforts very much: TIA !!!
>>
>> Cheers, svobi
>>     
>
>
> Hi again, 
> With doing some tries to get a compare between Duplicity & rsync 
> I haven't been successfully ;-(
>
> How does the command for duplicity non-encrypted look like if 
> rsync is like following here ?
>
> rsync -av --delete --progress /home/sna/ /media/LD149ext3/710e804 
>
> Your assistance is hot awaited here ! ;-)
>
> TIA & cheers, svobi
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
>   

duplicity --no-encryption /home/sna/ /media/LD149ext3/710e804

Should do what you're asking for.

Cheers