[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime
From: |
Soren Hansen |
Subject: |
[Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:53:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
Hi!
I'm trying out duplicity and it seems that duplicity stores its
timestamps as ints, but I use XFS which has nanosecond resolution. I
believe utimes(2) only allows us to see microsecond resolution, but this
still means that there's about a 1:1000 chance that duplicity will think
that a given file has not had its timestamp updated. :)
The easy fix would of course be to cast the st_mtime from that stat call
to an int, but it seems more correct to actually store the full
timestamp.
Thoughts?
--
Soren Hansen
Ubuntu Server Team
http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime,
Soren Hansen <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime, Soren Hansen, 2007/10/11
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/11
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime, Soren Hansen, 2007/10/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime, Peter Schuller, 2007/10/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime, Soren Hansen, 2007/10/12
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Non-integer mtime, Peter Schuller, 2007/10/12