dotgnu-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]Potentially useful kit


From: Barry Fitzgerald
Subject: Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]Potentially useful kit
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:38:30 -0500

Barry Fitzgerald wrote:
> 
> Chris Smith wrote:
> >
> > On Monday 07 January 2002 17:10, Bill Lance wrote:
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > I've read thru your white papaer and other material.
> > > Very interesting.
> > >
> > > Is all of that GPL'ed?
> >
> > Not currently.
> > I own the license as it's all 100% my work spanning (on and off) the last 5
> > years or so.
> >
> > TBH, I'm not much for nailing down ownership, but whatever happens with the
> > licensing I don't want to stop myself from being able to using the 
> > components
> > with my clients (libraries, servers and all that).
> >
> > Anyway, GPL'ing / Dual licensing, whaterver.... not a problem (which is what
> > you want to hear really!)
> >
> 
> Well, if you GPL'ed it, we would stop you at all from using it with your
> clients (unless those clients dislike the GNU GPL, which frankly, is
> rather un-enlightened behavior in any sense).
> 
>         -Barry


I'm sorry - that was a typo - we wouldn't stop you at all.  As in we
would not interfer :).  Sorry if this caused any confusion.  However,
the GNU GPL allows for the philosophical freedom 0, which allows you
complete usage of the software.  There's nothing in GPL'ing the software
that would stop you.

        -Barry


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]