|
From: | David Talbot |
Subject: | Re: [Auth]'non traditional' clients for DotGNU authentication? |
Date: | Tue, 07 Aug 2001 08:23:54 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2+) Gecko/20010801 |
dotgnu/passport systems can be broken into a few logical divisions:1) A repository that stores a (username/password or other authentication scheme)
2) A repository that stores relevent information on that person 3) A way for clients to use the authentication in a generic waya) Concrete implementations in different languages and for different devices.
I suppose the overall rules you want for a system like this is to have the server behave the same in all situations and it's up to the client side implementers on what they want to do with that.
For example there was discussion a short time ago about biometrics. If I'm running a business and I want my people to login using a thumbprint, I could create a thumbprint to dotgnu gateway server that takes the biometric data that I've matched up with a dotgnu passport then passes the generic dotgnu password upstream to the dotgnu authentication server. The same could apply to a call center that uses voice print, etc etc.
The overall concept is you keep the server simple and let people build what they want in terms of client side applications and authentication gateways.
-David Talbot David Oliver wrote:
I'm new to this list, so pardon my ignorance. Several digests ago, I saw a mini-debate about client-resident software (the need for, or not) and development browser selection. Is this project considering non-PC clients? I'm thinking of wirelessly-connected PDAs, settop boxes, game consoles, etc.. Or, is the interest solely (or mostly) in traditional PCs running rich browsers? -- David Oliver IBM Pervasive Computing address@hidden _______________________________________________ Auth mailing list address@hidden http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auth
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |