discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problems with packet communication using BPSK


From: Shruti Gupta
Subject: Re: Problems with packet communication using BPSK
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:49:29 +0530
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0

Hi!

I know that without any packet structure in '1', the received data is being decoded as "AAAAAA......" or "55555.....". Is that what you meant by inverted bit stream? I am not really clear about what you meant by phase ambiguity?

Thanks
SG


On 10/08/20 12:20 pm, Shruti Gupta wrote:

Hi all!

I am working on implementing  BPSK communication system with SDR in GNURadio. I tried implementing packet-communication in GNURadio using two systems each acting as TX and RX. Using the examples provided in gr-digital , I tried running TX and RX with LimeSDR Mini, but was unable to get them to work. In order to identify and solve the issues, I moved on to implementing everything in step-wise approach, as in-
  1. Transmit just alternating 1’s and 0’s using BPSK modulation and receiving it on other end using synchronization and demodulation.
  2. Introduce packet structure into the previous raw-communication model .
  3. Then add FEC into the system and finally include CRC and achieve the same packet-communication as provided with gr-digital.
In this step-wise approach, I was able to get raw communication model (point 1 in above) work properly. However, I am not able to get packet version (number 2) working. I used the same system settings just the introduction of packet structure at TX and correlation estimation & header-payload demux at RX but still no luck. Is there some issue with the way I am implementing packet formation at TX or the correlation estimator is the problem? You can find my implementation at following link:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1TIWhNuVmclenhLj4qJK2HT-er6RoCcco?usp=sharing

Any suggestions/pointers in order to resolve the issue will be helpful.

Thanks and Regards
SG

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]