[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: linphone, still free?
From: |
Lorenzo L. Ancora |
Subject: |
Re: linphone, still free? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Dec 2024 00:00:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Zoho Mail |
>> One of the questions is whether the user - who may legitimately want to not
>> include non-free or closed source clients in a conversation - should be
>> warned that the remote endpoint uses a non-free version of the same VoIP
>> software used by the caller/meeting holder.
> Letting people know about the issues of using nonfree software in general is
> probably the best way to go.
I suggest this ethical issue needs a less passive approach.
What about adding a dedicated FSD antifeature label?
~Lorenzo
PS: merry Xmas. 🎄
- Re: linphone, still free?, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2024/12/11
- Re: linphone, still free?, Craig Topham, 2024/12/13
- Re: linphone, still free?, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2024/12/13
- Re: linphone, still free?, Craig Topham, 2024/12/16
- Re: linphone, still free?, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2024/12/16
- Re: linphone, still free?, Krzysztof Siewicz, 2024/12/17
- Re: linphone, still free?, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2024/12/17
- Re: linphone, still free?, Narcis Garcia, 2024/12/18
- Re: linphone, still free?, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2024/12/18
- Re: linphone, still free?, Craig Topham, 2024/12/23
- Re: linphone, still free?,
Lorenzo L. Ancora <=
- Re: linphone, still free?, Craig Topham, 2024/12/24