denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] The 2.0.4 release (was Re: Last call for any bugs bef


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] The 2.0.4 release (was Re: Last call for any bugs before Release 2.0.4)
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 12:39:21 +0000

On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 22:35 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I updated the 2.0.4 zip file so that it is actually 2.0.4. That was my
> fault. 
> 
I've installed the .exe file on another machine and all is well. I think
I forgot to re-boot the last time I tested it. I'll put something in the
Denemo startup for windows to remind the user (i.e. on first use with a
new .denemo-x.x.x)

I think this is good for release. Let me know when the tar ball gets to
ftp.gnu.org

Richard

> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Richard Shann
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>         I've tested the 2.0.4 mingw zip and .exe files (well someone
>         else tested
>         the zip actually). There are two problems, the 2.0.4 zip is
>         actually
>         current master. And, the .exe crashes on startup with a cairo
>         failure.
>         I'll try the 0.0.0 exe tomorrow.
>         
>         Richard
>         
>         
>         On Sun, 2016-03-06 at 20:01 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
>         > I've given a sanity-check on
>         >
>         http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/denemo-release/denemo-2.0.4.tar.gz
>         >
>         > and this appears to me to be good for release. If those able
>         can report
>         > on the binaries at
>         http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/?C=M;O=D
>         > labelled with 2.0.4 that would be good. (As well as meaning
>         you are the
>         > first to be running the new release :) )
>         >
>         > Richard
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > On Sat, 2016-03-05 at 12:07 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
>         > > Jeremiah - can you create the 2.0.4 branch now and
>         candidate tarball and
>         > > binaries from it?
>         > >
>         > > Richard
>         > >
>         > >
>         > >
>         > > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 19:08 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
>         > > > The current set of binaries at
>         http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/
>         > > > (labelled 0.0.0) has all fixes for serious bugs that are
>         known to me.
>         > > > Please report anything further you may find before the
>         end of the week.
>         > > > I'll update with any further translations that come in
>         this week, and
>         > > > then we should be good for release.
>         > > >
>         > > > Richard
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         > > > _______________________________________________
>         > > > Denemo-devel mailing list
>         > > > address@hidden
>         > > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>         > >
>         > >
>         > >
>         > > _______________________________________________
>         > > Denemo-devel mailing list
>         > > address@hidden
>         > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > Denemo-devel mailing list
>         > address@hidden
>         > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>         
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Denemo-devel mailing list
>         address@hidden
>         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>         
> 
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]