[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32
From: |
Jan Engelhardt |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32 |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:19:26 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07) |
On Monday 2016-12-05 14:03, Ben Elliston wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:37:21PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> + aarch64:Linux:*:* | aarch64_be:Linux:*:*)
>> + eval $set_cc_for_build
>> + if echo __ILP32__ | $CC_FOR_BUILD -E - 2>/dev/null \
>> + | grep -q __ILP32__
>> + then
>> + :
>> + else
>> + UNAME_MACHINE=${UNAME_MACHINE}_ilp32
>> + fi
>
>Please don't use set_cc_for_build. From config.guess:
>
># CC_FOR_BUILD -- compiler used by this script. Note that the use of a
># compiler to aid in system detection is discouraged as it requires
># temporary files to be created and, as you can see below, it is a
># headache to deal with in a portable fashion.
>
>Please find another way to get the ilp32 status. I'm not accepting
>new uses of set_cc_for_build, because it is an abomination.
Furthermore, ILP32 modes are not supposed to be expressed in the platform
tuple. x32 configurations, so far, are simply invoked as
./configure --host=x86_64-linux-gnu CFLAGS=-m32 LDFLAGS=-m32
because that's what it is.
- [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32, Andreas Schwab, 2016/12/05
- Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32, Ben Elliston, 2016/12/05
- Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32,
Jan Engelhardt <=
- Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32, Andreas Schwab, 2016/12/05
- Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32, Ben Elliston, 2016/12/05
- Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32, Andreas Schwab, 2016/12/06
- Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32, Ben Elliston, 2016/12/06
- Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32, Andreas Schwab, 2016/12/06
- Re: [PATCH] Recognize aarch64_ilp32, Earnie, 2016/12/06