[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading
From: |
F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:01:00 +0100 |
Am Sonntag, den 02.11.2008, 14:06 -0500 schrieb John Cowan:
> Tobia Conforto scripsit:
>
> > Moreover, they must be conveyed in a form suitable for relinking with
> > a modified version of rbtree.scm. This means that all programs
> > statically linked with Chicken must also be distributed in object
> > code, to allow relinking with a different version of rbtree.scm
>
> This is the killer part for C/C++ applications, so I have to say that
> I now agree with Felix. In Java (which is what I mostly use these days)
> it doesn't matter, because code is rarely if ever distributed in linked
> form (using gcj); it's always distributed in .jar form, which is basically
> a ZIPfile of object form.
Isn't that crazy? When you write your code trying to being agnostic
about the way it's going to be compiled -- as an advanced programmer
would might eventually try to do -- you can attach any copyright notice
you want; the way it's being compiled will decide about the copyright!!?
Hey, this opens to loop hole for inclusion: include it in object form as
an dynamically linked .so!
Really?
}}8-o
/no-comment
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Tobia Conforto, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Tobia Conforto, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Alex Shinn, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Marc Feeley, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, John Cowan, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading,
F. Wittenberger <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, John Cowan, 2008/11/03
Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/02