[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Nov 2008 14:17:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
> The best solution however seem to have a look at wikipedia and ask
> around whether this license would be ok:
>
> http://web.mit.edu/~emin/www/source_code/red_black_tree/index.html
This software is effectively under a 3-clause BSD license with unusual
wording: it does not contain any equivalent of the first clause, which
says that you can't remove the copyright notice, list of conditions,
or disclaimer. Nobody is likely to do so; in any event, removing the
copyright notice is fraud.
> Chicken has gotten a FFI, hasn't it?
Yes. (Language note: "has gotten" in American English means only "has
acquired", "has obtained", or the like; it's obsolete in other varieties
of English. You want either "has" (AmE or BrE) or "has got" (BrE)).
--
You are a child of the universe no less John Cowan
than the trees and all other acyclic http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
graphs; you have a right to be here. address@hidden
--DeXiderata by Sean McGrath
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Marc Feeley, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, John Cowan, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, John Cowan, 2008/11/03
Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/02