[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Nov 2008 14:06:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Tobia Conforto scripsit:
> Moreover, they must be conveyed in a form suitable for relinking with
> a modified version of rbtree.scm. This means that all programs
> statically linked with Chicken must also be distributed in object
> code, to allow relinking with a different version of rbtree.scm
This is the killer part for C/C++ applications, so I have to say that
I now agree with Felix. In Java (which is what I mostly use these days)
it doesn't matter, because code is rarely if ever distributed in linked
form (using gcj); it's always distributed in .jar form, which is basically
a ZIPfile of object form.
--
John Cowan address@hidden
"Not to know The Smiths is not to know K.X.U." --K.X.U.
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Peter Bex, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Tobia Conforto, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Tobia Conforto, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Alex Shinn, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, Marc Feeley, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, John Cowan, 2008/11/03
Re: [Chicken-users] faster threading, F. Wittenberger, 2008/11/02